Experiencia pictórica, imaginando desde el interior y penetración imaginativa
Resumen
En la experiencia pictórica, normalmente somos conscientes de las características visibles de dos conjuntos distintos de objetos: la superficie que representa y las entidades representadas. Los relatos de la experiencia pictórica basados en la imaginación sostienen que nuestra conciencia de lo representado (por ejemplo, de un paisaje o de un hombre) es esencialmente imaginativa. Mi principal objetivo en este artículo es ofrecer una objeción específica a los relatos basados en la imaginación. Más específicamente, sostengo que no pueden explicar el hecho de que el tipo de conciencia, que se ejemplifica por nuestra conciencia de la escena representada involucrada en nuestra experiencia pictórica no ilusionista de una imagen bidimensional, no podría ejemplificarse sin la conciencia perceptiva simultánea de alguna superficie marcada.
Descargas
Referencias
Budd, Malcolm (1992a). «Review of Kendall Walton's Mimesis as Make–Believe». Mind 101: pp. 195–198.
Budd, Malcolm (1992b). «On Looking at a Picture». In Psychoanalysis Mind and Art: Perspectives on Richard Wollheim, edited by James Hopkins and Anthony Savile, Oxford: Blackwell.
Casey, Edward (1976). Imagining. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Collingwood, Robin G. (1958). The Principles of Art. New York: Galaxy.
Dorsch, Fabian (2009). «Judging and the Scope of Mental Agency». In Mental Actions, edited by Lucy O’Brien and Matthew Soteriou. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dorsch, Fabian (2010a) «Transparency and Imagining Seeing». Philosophical Explorations 13, no. 3: pp. 173–200.
Dorsch, Fabian (2010b). «Emotional Imagining and Our Responses to Fiction». Enrahonar 44: pp. 153–176.
Dorsch, Fabian (2012). The Unity of Imagining. Frankfurt: Ontos.
Dorsch, Fabian (2013). Seeing the Depicted. Manuscript.
Evans, Gareth (1982). The Varieties of Reference. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gombrich, Ernst (1960). Art and Illusion. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Hopkins, Robert (1998). Picture, Image and Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hopkins, Robert (2003). «What Makes Representational Painting Truly Visual?». Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, suppl., 78: pp. 149–167.
Hopkins, Robert (2004). «Painting, Sculpture, Sight, and Touch». British Journal of Aesthetics 44: pp. 149–166.
Hopkins, Robert (2010). «Inflected Pictorial Experience: Its Treatment and Significance». In Philosophical Perspectives on Depiction, edited by Catharine Abell and Katerina Bantinaki. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 151–180.
Hopkins, Robert (unpublished). «Pictorial Presence». Manuscript.
Husserl, Edmund (1980). Phantasie, Bildbewußtsein, Erinnerung. Den Haag: Nijhoff y Kluwer.
Husserl, Edmund (2001). Logical Investigations. London: Routledge.
Lopes, Dominic (2005). Sight and Sensibility. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Macpherson, Fiona (forthcoming). «Cognitive Penetration of Colour Experience: Rethinking the Issue in Light of an Indirect Mechanism». Philosophy and Phenomenological Research.
Macpherson, Fiona (ed.) (unpublished). Phenomenal Presence. Manuscript.
Martin, Michael G. F. (2001). «Out of the Past: Episodic Recall as Retained Acquaintance». In Time and Memory, edited by Christoph Hoerl and Teresa McCormack. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 257–284.
Martin, Michael G. F. (2003). «The Transparency of Experience». Mind and Language 17: pp. 376–425.
Martin, Michael G. F. (2010). «What's in a Look?». In Perceiving the World, edited by Bence Nanay. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 160–225.
McDowell, John (1984). «De Re Senses». Philosophical Quarterly 34: pp. 283–294.
McGinn, Colin (2004). Mindsight. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.
Millar, Alan (2010). «Knowledge and Recognition». In The Nature and Value of Knowledge: Three Investigations, edited by Duncan Pritchard, Alan Millar and Adrian Haddock. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 121–242.
O'Shaughnessy, Brian (2003). Consciousness and the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Peacocke, Christopher (1985). «Imagination, Experience and Possibility». In Essays on Berkeley, edited by John Foster and Howard Robinson. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 19–35.
Podro, Michael (1998). Depiction. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Sartre, Jean–Paul (2004). The Imaginary. London: Routledge.
Schier, Flint (1986). Deeper into Pictures. Cambridge: University Press.
Scruton, Roger (1974). Art and Imagination. London: Methuen & Co.
Searle, John (1983). Intentionality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Stock, Kathleen (2008). «The Role of Imagining in Seeing–In». Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 66: pp. 365–380.
Strawson, Peter (1970). «Imagination and Perception». In Experience and Theory, edited by Lawrence Forster and Joe William Swanson. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.
Velleman, David (2000). The Possibility of Practical Reason. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Walton, Kendall (1990). Mimesis as Make–Believe. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.
Walton, Kendall (2002). «Depiction, Perception, and Imagination: Responses to Richard Wollheim». The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 60: pp. 27–35.
Wiesing, Lambert (2005/2009). Artifical Presence. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1984). Zettel. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.
Wollheim, Richard (1973). «Imagination and Identification». In On Art and the Mind. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.
Wollheim, Richard (1980). «Seeing–as, Seeing–in, and Pictorial Representation». In Art and Its Objects, 2nd edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 205–226.
Wollheim, Richard (1984). The Thread of Life. Yale: Yale University Press.
Wollheim, Richard (1989). Painting as an Art. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Wollheim, Richard (2003). «What Makes Representational Painting Truly Visual?». Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, suppl., 78: pp. 131–147.
Derechos de autor 2016 © Analysis
Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObrasDerivadas 4.0.