Arthur Danto and the fallacies of Art Theory

  • Jorge Roaro Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain
Keywords: Mimesis, Representation, Institutional Theory of Art, Realism, Art, Ontology of Art

Abstract

This paper makes a critical overview of some of the central issues addressed by the philosopher and art critic Arthur Danto throughout his career, with a special emphasis on his famous essay The Art World, presented here in conjunction with this paper, and analyzes the reasons why the main theoretical contribution of Danto, its Institutional Theory of Art, is a flawed representation of the problems inherent to the art world. It is divided in two parts: the first one is centered on the idea of imitation as essence of art, and the concept of «world of art», and the second one in the role of theory as a final explanation of art, according to Danto.

Author Biography

Jorge Roaro, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain

Jorge Roaro is a Researcher at the Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain. PhD in Philosophy at the
Universidad de Salamanca, Spain. His main interests are in the Spanish Renaissance humanism, the humanist
critique of culture, philosophy and art history, language philosophy, the relationship between literature and
philosophy, reflection on the philosophical problem of war, and dinosaurs. Co-editor of Disputatio.

Published
2013-12-20
How to Cite
[1]
Roaro, J. 2013. Arthur Danto and the fallacies of Art Theory. Disputatio. 2, 3 (Dec. 2013), 195-216.
Section
Articles and Essays