The limits of theory in the face of literary art: a humanist perspective

  • Eduardo Cesar Maia Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Brazil
Keywords: Humanism, Literary Theory, Literary Criticism

Abstract

In keeping with the perspective of philosophers such as Ernesto Grassi and Francisco José Martín, and literature theorists such as Antoine Compagnon, Richard Freadman, and Seumas Miller, among others, I consider the humanist tradition, whether in philosophy or literary criticism, to be the expiatory goat of the scientist, rationalist, positivist mentalities and the most diverse forms of ideological radicalism coming from the main currents of literary theory that developed in the last century and which influence us to this day. I will show in the development of this essay that, although it has been stigmatized by efficient defamation work carried out by various detractors, the humanist perspective to which I refer, as long as it is reevaluated and adapted to the present conditions and demands, can be an alternative path, or at least a complementary one, to the radical specialization of literary studies, offering valuable suggestions for the exercise of journalistic criticism, and also critically dialoguing with the academic discipline of Literary Theory.

Author Biography

Eduardo Cesar Maia, Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Brazil

Eduardo Cesar Maia é professor do curso de Comunicação Social (CAA) e do Programa de Pós-Graduação em Letras (Teoria da Literatura) da Universidade Federal de Pernambuco. Atualmente é editor-chefe da Revista de Estudos Universitários da UFPE e colunista do Estado da Arte, suplemento de cultura, filosofia e artes do Jornal O Estado de S. Paulo. Doutor em Teoria da Literatura [≈ PhD] pela Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, com estágio doutoral na Universidad de Salamanca (Espanha), tendo desenvolvido tese, com o apoio da CAPES, a respeito da atualidade da tradição crítica humanista através das obras de José Ortega y Gasset e Álvaro Lins.

References

Barthes, R. (1984). La muerte del autor. En El susuro del lenguaje. Barcelona: Paidós.

Compagnon, A. (1999). O demônio da teoria. Belo Horizonte: UFMG.

Eagleton, T. (1999). La función de la crítica. Barcelona: Paidós.

Eichenbaum, B. (1980). La teoría del método formal. En T. TODOROV, Teoría de la literatura de los formalistas rusos. Madrid: Siglo Veintiuno.

Hillis miller, J. (1986). The Ethics of Reading: Kant, de Man, Eliot, Trollope, James and Benjamin. New York: Columbia Press.

Merquior, J. G. (1975). O estruturalismo dos pobres e outras questões. Rio de Janeiro: Tempo Brasileiro.

Piquer, D. V. (2008). Historia de la crítica literaria. Barcelona: Ariel.

Selden, R. (. (2010). Historia de la crítica literaria del siglo XX. Madrid: Akal.

Todorov, T. (. (1980). Teoría de la literatura de los formalistas rusos. Madrid: Siglo Veintiuno.

Unamuno, M. d. (1951). Ensayos (Tomo II). Madrid: Aguilar.

Published
2019-09-30
How to Cite
[1]
Maia, E.C. 2019. The limits of theory in the face of literary art: a humanist perspective. Disputatio. 8, 10 (Sep. 2019), 71-94. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5281/10.5281/zenodo.3576128.