Science and politics in democratic contexts I: Scientific practice

  • Paulo Vélez León Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain
Keywords: Philosophy of Science, Epistemology, Knowledge, Scientific Politics, STS, Kitcher

Abstract

The political dimension of science has gained a particular interest in most recent decades for areas of knowledge like the Philosophy of science, as well as for political studies of science, history of science, among others. One reason for this development is that we are more conscious the results obtained by a scientist are a product of the interaction and interrelation of epistemic and none epistemic (the socio-political context) values. This dynamic is one of the factors which make progress in science possible and reflects, at the same time, its integrity. Based on the contributions provided by Philip Kitcher, I shall characterize in this paper the two forms to treat scientific knowledge from a philosophical perspective. I shall argue, following Kitcher, that the scientific practice (the epistemic aspect) and social aspects of knowledge (none epistemic aspects) are not two different and disconnected things, but a unity of reasons (theoretical and practical ones) which enable the progress of scientific knowledge.

Author Biography

Paulo Vélez León, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain

Paulo Vélez León is a Research Fellow at the Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Spain. His main interests are in
theoretical philosophy (metaphysics and theory of knowledge), philosophical methodology, theory of value
(aesthetics) and history of thought and science, especially the Hispanic mediaeval. He has participated in several research projects and collaborated with different groups of basic and applied research; he has also made advanced studies at the Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC). He has published in his areas of specialisation, several articles in journals and proceedings.

References

Gallardo, Álvaro (2016). «Kitcher y la organización de la investigación científica: Un análisis de la ciencia desde los modelos ideales de la Economía». Revista Colombiana de Filosofía de la Ciencia 16, no. 33: pp. 83–112.

Gallegos, Miguel (2014). «Historia de la ciencia, política y producción de conocimientos». Revista Iberoamericana CTS. El foro. Disponible en: http://www.revistacts.net/elforo/629-el-debate-las-vias-de-la-heteronomia-en-las-ciencias-sociales

Gómez, Ricardo J. (2014). «Hacia una filosofía política del conocimiento científico». En El conocimiento como práctica. Investigación, valoración, ciencia y difusión, editado por María Cristina Di Gregori, Leopoldo Rueda y Livio Mattarollo. La Plata: Universidad Nacional de La Plata.

Gómez, Ricardo J. (2016). «Sobre el concepto aristotélico de ciencia. Reconstrucción y vigencia». Disputatio. Philosophical Research Bulletin 5, no. 6: pp. 237-265. Disponible en: https://disputatio.eu/vols/vol-5-no-6/gomez-episteme/

Kitcher, Philip (1993). The Advancement of Science. Nueva York-Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kitcher, Philip (1998). «A Plea for Science Studies». En A House Built on Sand: Exposing Postmodernist Myths about Science, editado por Noretta Koertge. Nueva York-Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 32-56.

Kitcher, Philip (2001). Science, Truth, and Democracy. Nueva York-Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Kitcher, Philip (2011). Science in a Democratic Society. Nueva York: Prometheus Books.

Maia, Eduardo Cesar y Roaro, Jorge (2012), «Una perspectiva filosófica de la ciencia hoy en día: Entrevista con Alfredo Marcos». Disputatio. Philosophical Research Bulletin 1, núm. 1, pp. 39-47. Disponible en: https://disputatio.eu/vols/vol-1-no-1/roaro-maia-entrevista/

Vélez León, Paulo (2015). «¿Ontología u Ontologías?». Disputatio. Philosophical Research Bulletin 4, núm. 5, pp. 299-339. Disponible en: https://disputatio.eu/vols/vol-4-no-5/velezleon-ontologia/
Published
2018-12-31
How to Cite
[1]
Vélez León, P. 2018. Science and politics in democratic contexts I: Scientific practice. Disputatio. 7, 8 (Dec. 2018), a014. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2553509.
Section
Articles and Essays