Science and politics in democratic contexts II: Social Contract for Science
Abstract
States take increasingly part in scientifical matters ever more actively and enthusiastically, e.g., in the design of politics for science or the creation of mechanisms and tools for the evaluation of the performance of entities involved in science. This implication of the state necessarily directs the relation between science and politics. In democratical contexts, these relations are studied within the framework of the Social Contract for Science (CSC) which is a theoretical model for describing and understanding the relationships between the scientific community and politics. In this writing, I shall concentrate on explaining the fundamental characteristics of the classical model of the social contract for science and the new version of this model. I provide arguments that clarify the importance of political actors to commit to helping the scientific community and providing the necessary financial resources for the progress of science, without implying, however, the political intervention of the state in the scientific investigation or the achievement of specific results. It is important on the other hand that the scientific community acknowledges the importance of being able to rely on public financing by the state for the development of scientific investigation, and accept the commitment to integrity, productivity, and high quality in work on the progress of science.
References
Brooks, Harvey. (1990). «Lessons of History: Successive Challenges to Science Policy». In The Research System in Transition, eds. Susan E. Cozeens; Peter Healey; Arie Rip; and John Ziman. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2091-0_2
Bush, Vannevar (1945). Science, The Endless Frontier. A Report to the President by Vannevar Bush, Director of the Office of Scientific Research and Development. Washington DC, U.S. Government Printing Office. Reimpreso en: Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science 48 (3), 1945: pp. 231-264.
Cozzens, Susan; Healy, Peter; Rip, Arie, y Ziman John (eds.) (1990). The research system in transition. Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-2091-0
Fuller, Steve (2000). The governance of science. Ideology and the Future of the Open Society. Buckingham/Philadelphia: Open University Press.
Gómez Rodríguez, Amparo y Balmer, Brian (2013). «Ciencia y Política: una cuestión de fronteras». En: Estudios políticos de la ciencia. Políticas y desarrollo científico en el siglo XX, editado por Amparo Gómez Rodríguez y Antonio Fco. Canales Serrano. Madrid: Plaza y Valdéz, pp. 15-34.
Gómez Rodríguez, Amparo. (2014). «Frontera e integridad en el “contrato social para la ciencia española”, 1907-1939». Dynamis 34(2): pp. 465-487. https://doi.org/10.4321/S0211-95362014000200010
Guston, David H. (2000). Between Politics and Science: Assuring the Integrity and Productivity of Research. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511571480
Guston, David H. (2000b). «Retiring the Social Contract for Science». Issues in Science and Technology 15, no. 4.
Ioannidis, John P. A. (2018). «Replantear la financiación». Investigación y Ciencia 507.
Kappos, David J. (2013). «¿Quién financiará la próxima gran idea?». Investigación y Ciencia 447.
Kleinman, Daniel, L. (1995). Politics on the Endless Frontier. Postwar Research Policy in the United States. Durham-Londres: Duke University Press.
Lane, Neal (2008). «US science and technology: an uncoordinated system that seems to work». Technology in Society 30, no. 3–4: pp. 248–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2008.04.025
Lubchenco, Jane (1998). «Entering the Century of the Environment: A New Social Contract for Science». Science 279, no. 5350: pp. 491-497. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.279.5350.491
Merton, Robert K. (1973 [1942]). «The Normative Structure of Science». In The Sociology of Science: Theoretical and Empirical Investigations, ed. Norman W. Storer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Molas Gallart, Jordi (2014). «El nuevo contrato social de la ciencia». SEBBM 180: pp. 7-9
Myhrvold, Nathan (2016). «¿Quién debe financiar la investigación básica?». Investigación y Ciencia 474.
Press, Frank (1988). «The Dilemma of the Golden Age». In The Presidency and Science Advising, Vol. 6, ed. Kenneth W. Thompson. New York: University Press of America.
Price, Don K. (1954). Government and Science: Their Dynamic Relation in American Democracy. New York: New York University Press.
Ravetz Jerry (1988). «A New Social Contract for Science». Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 8 (1): pp. 20-30. https://doi.org/10.1177/027046768800800107
Rip, Arie (2003). «Societal challenges for R&D evaluation». En: Learning form science and technology evaluation. Experiences from the United States and Europe, editado por Philip Shapira y Stefan Kuhlmann. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, pp. 32-53.
Sanz Merino, Noemí. (2008). «La apropiación política de la ciencia: origen y evolución de una nueva tecnocracia». Revista iberoamericana de ciencia tecnología y sociedad 4(10): pp. 85-123.
Smith, Bruce L. R. (1994). «The United States: The Formation and Breakdown of the Postwar Government-Science Compact». In Scientists and the State: Domestic Structures and the International Context, ed. Etel Solingen. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Spaey, Jacques (1969). Le Développement par la science: essai sur l’apparition et l’organisation de la politique scientifique des Etats. Paris, UNESCO. [Trad. cast.: El desarrollo por la ciencia: ensayo sobre la aparición y la organización de la política científica de los estados. Madrid: UNESCO – Ministerio de Educación y Ciencia, 1970].
Steelman, John R. (1947). Science and Public Policy. 5 vols. The President’s Scientific Research Board. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
Stokes, Donald E. (1997). Pasteur’s Quadrant: Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Vélez León, Paulo (2018). «Ciencia y política en contextos democráticos: La práctica científica». Disputatio. Philosophical Research Bulletin 7, no. 8: a014.
Ziman, John (1984). An Introduction to Science Studies: The Philosophical and Social Aspects of Science and Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511608360
Zuckerman, Harriet. (1977). «Deviant Behavior and Social Control in Science». In Deviance and Social Change, ed. Edward Sagarin. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Copyright (c) 2018 © Disputatio
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
