Physics Needs Philosophy. Philosophy Needs Physics

  • Carlo Rovelli CPT, Aix-Marseille Université, Université de Toulon, CNRS Marseille, France
  • Francesco Consiglio Universidad de Granada, Spain
Keywords: Philosophy of Physics, Aristotle, Popper, Kuhn

Abstract

Contrary to claims about the irrelevance of philosophy for science, I argue that philosophy has had, and still has, far more influence on physics than is commonly assumed. I maintain that the current anti-philosophical ideology has had damaging effects on the fertility of science. I also suggest that recent important empirical results, such as the detection of the Higgs particle and gravitational waves, and the failure to detect supersymmetry where many expected to find it, question the validity of certain philosophical assumptions common among theoretical physicists, inviting us to engage in a clearer philosophical reflection on scientific method.

Author Biographies

Carlo Rovelli, CPT, Aix-Marseille Université, Université de Toulon, CNRS Marseille, France

Carlo Rovelli is Director of the Quantum Gravity Group of the Centre de Physique Théorique (CPT) of the Aix–
Marseille–Université, France. PhD in Physics at the Università degli Studi di Padova, Italy. His work is mainly in
the field of quantum gravity, where he is among the founders of the loop quantum gravity theory. He has also
worked in the history and philosophy of science. Has published books as Reality Is Not What It Seems (Penguin,
2016); Seven Brief Lessons on Physics (Penguin, 2015); The First Scientist: Anaximander and His Legacy
(Whestholme, 2011); What is Time? What is Space? (DiRenzo editore, 2006).

Francesco Consiglio, Universidad de Granada, Spain

Francesco Consiglio is a member of the research project “Habla interna, metacognición y la concepción
narrativa de la identidad” (MINECO: FFI2015-65953-P) and of the FiloLab Excellence Unit at the University of
Granada, Spain. He is CPhil in Philosophy of Mind at the University of Granada. He studied at the universities
of Siena (Laurea Triennale in Filosofia), Parma (Laurea Magistrale in Filosofia) and Salamanca. He mainly
focused, during his studies, on Theory of Knowledge and Philosophy of Mind. More recently, he focused on
Theory of Collective Intelligence and social cognition. He published both articles and translations in various
Spanish and Italian journals of philosophy and he gave talks in various congresses around Europe.

References

Abbott, Benjamin P., et al. (2017). «Multi-messenger observations of a binary neutron star merger». The Astrophysical Journal Letters 848, no. 2: L12. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aa91c9

Abbott, Benjamin P., et al. (LIGO Scientific Collaboration & Virgo Collaboration) (2017). «GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral». Physical Review Letters 119, no. 16: 161101. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.161101

Carnap, Rudolf (1932) «Überwindung der Metaphysik durch Logische Analyse der Sprache». Erkenntnis 2: pp. 10–31) (English translation «The Elimination of Metaphysics Through Logical Analysis of Language». En: Sarkar, S. (ed.) Logical Empiricism at Its Peak: Schlick, Carnap, and Neurath. Nueva York: Garland Pub., 1996).

Dawid, Richard (2013). String Theory and the Scientific Method. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139342513

Einstein, Aalbert (1986). «Letter to Robert A. Thornton, 7 December 1944. EA 61-574». En: The Collected Papers of Albert Einstein. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

Hawking, Stephen (2012). The Grand Design. Nueva York: Bantam.

Heidegger, Martin (1967). Sein und Zeit. Tubinga: Niemeyer.

Heisenberg, Werner (1925). «Über quantentheoretische Umdeutung kinematischer und mechanischer Beziehungen». Zeitschrift fur Physik 33, no. 1: pp. 879–893. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01328377

Howard, Don (1994). «‘A kind of vessel in which the struggle for eternal truth is played out’—Albert Einstein and the role of personality in science». En: Langdon, J.H., McGann, M.E. (eds.) The Natural History of Paradigms: Science and the Process of Intellectual Evolution, pp. 111–138. Indianapolis: University of Indianapolis Press.

Howard, Don (1997). «A peek behind the Veil of Maya: Einstein, Schopenhauer, and the historical background of the conception of space as a ground for the individuation of physical systems». En: Earman, J., Norton, J.D. (eds.) The Cosmos of Science. Pittsburgh-Konstanz Series in the Philosophy and History of Science, pp. 87–150. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.

Hutchinson, Darren S. y Johnson, Monte Ransome (2005). «Authenticating Aristotle’s Protrepticus». Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 29: pp. 193–294.

Iamblichus (1996). Protrepticus, vol. 6. Berlín: De Gruyter.

Kepler, Johannes (1992). Astronomia Nova (translated by William H. Donahue). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Pickering, Andrew (1999). Constructing Quarks: A Sociological History of Particle Physics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

Quine, Willard van Orman (2015). Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Rovelli, Carlo (2015). «Aristotle’s Physics: A Physicist’s Look». Journal of the American Philosophical Association 1: pp. 23–40 https://doi.org/10.1017/apa.2014.11

Weinberg, Stephen (1994). Dreams of a Final Theory. Nueva York: Vintage.
Published
2018-12-31
How to Cite
[1]
Rovelli, C. and Consiglio, F. 2018. Physics Needs Philosophy. Philosophy Needs Physics. Disputatio. 7, 8 (Dec. 2018), a019. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2554714.
Section
Articles and Essays