The Conceptual Architecture of Artificial Intelligence: From Mechanical Computation to Statistical Prediction

  • Paulo Vélez León Universidad Técnica Particular de Loja, Ecuador
Keywords: Artificial Intelligence, Conceptual Analysis, Machine Learning, Large Language Models, Opacity, Semantics

Abstract

This article reconstructs the conceptual architecture of artificial intelligence by tracing its intellectual genealogy and the methodological shift that leads from early projects of mechanical and programmable computation to the contemporary paradigm of statistical prediction. The analysis begins with nineteenth-century antecedents associated with the Analytical Engine and Ada Lovelace’s “Notes”, and then situates the mid-twentieth-century foundational turn marked by the theory of computation and the research programme inaugurated at Dartmouth. On this historical basis, the article draws a structural distinction between symbolic artificial intelligence—grounded in explicit rules and inferential traceability—and statistical artificial intelligence, whose performance relies on the optimisation of mathematical functions over large volumes of data. The central section characterises large language models as systems of probabilistic inference over linguistic sequences and identifies three conceptually decisive features: the absence of semantic understanding and intentionality, dependence on statistical correlations, and structural opacity. The contribution is limited to the conceptual level. Its purpose is to establish a precise analytical framework that avoids conflating linguistic performance with reasoning and that enables subsequent normative—including constitutional—assessments of the use of artificial intelligence in decision-making functions.

References

Bender, Emily M, Timnit Gebru, Angelina McMillan-Major, and Shmargaret Shmitchell. “On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots.” Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 2021.

Bishop, Christopher M. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. New York: Springer, 2006.

Brown, Tom B, Benjamin Mann, Nick Ryder, and others. “Language Models Are Few-Shot Learners.” Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 33 (2020).

Burrell, Jenna. “How the Machine Thinks.” Big Data & Society 3, no. 1 (2016).

Chalmers, David J. The Conscious Mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996.

Dennett, Daniel C. The Intentional Stance. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1987.

Doshi-Velez, Finale, and Been Kim. “Towards a Rigorous Science of Interpretable Machine Learning.” ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1702.08608, 2017.

Goodfellow, Ian, Yoshua Bengio, and Aaron Courville. Deep Learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2016.

Holzinger, Andreas, and others. “From XAI to Trustworthy AI.” In Explainable AI, 3–18. Springer, 2022.

Kaplan, Jerry. Artificial Intelligence: What Everyone Needs to Know. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.

LeCun, Yann, Yoshua Bengio, and Geoffrey Hinton. “Deep Learning.” Nature 521 (2015): 436–44.

Minsky, Marvin, ed. Semantic Information Processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1968.

Mitchell, Tom M. Machine Learning. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1997.

Newell, Allen, and Herbert A Simon. “Computer Science as Empirical Inquiry: Symbols and Search.” Communications of the ACM 19, no. 3 (1976): 113–26.

Russell, Stuart, and Peter Norvig. Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ: Pearson, 2021.

Searle, John R. “Minds, Brains, and Programs.” Behavioral and Brain Sciences 3, no. 3 (1980): 417–57.

Vaswani, Ashish, Noam Shazeer, Niki Parmar, and others. “Attention Is All You Need.” In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, Vol. 30, 2017.
Published
2025-12-30
How to Cite
[1]
Vélez León, P. 2025. The Conceptual Architecture of Artificial Intelligence: From Mechanical Computation to Statistical Prediction. Disputatio. 14, 29 (Dec. 2025), 185-193. DOI:https://doi.org/10.63413/disputatio.966.
Section
Short Articles