Ethics as a Condition of the World: The Inexpressible, the Transcendental and the Point of the Tractatus

  • Denis McManus University of Southampton
Keywords: Ethics, World, Subject, Metaphilosophy

Abstract

This paper presents a reading of the Tractatus’ remarks on ethics. Drawing on work by Anselm Müller, subsequently developed by Anthony Price, the reading makes of some of Wittgenstein’s most striking and most puzzling early remarks a recognizable and insightful account of ethical experience, while also accommodating the equally striking formal quality of those remarks. 

The account identifies a distinctive ethical achievement that requires a distance from particular concrete goods that one might pursue and a responsiveness to those goods as a whole—to one’s world as a whole; only through such openness is one open to the abstract objective that is doing what is best; and only through openness to that does one express oneself in, and assume responsibility for, one’s actions. This account allows us to understand why, for example, Wittgenstein connects ‘absolute or ethical value’ with ‘wonder at the existence of the world’ and with ‘understand[ing] the question about the meaning of life’. But it also makes sense of why that is precisely a question, and why those to whom ‘the meaning of life … become[s] clear’ cannot ‘say in what this meaning consist[s]’. The responsiveness to a good which ethical subjects distinctively manifest is a responsiveness not to some distinctive and describable state of affairs but to the question of what is best—willing determination of what here and now that is. 

This account yields a vision of self-expression not as hearkening to some inner voice but as an openness to one’s life as a whole; and this, in turn, opens up a way of approaching the puzzle of Wittgenstein’s insistence that ‘of [the willing subject] we cannot speak’. I also suggest that we find here one possible sense for Wittgenstein’s famous remark to Ludwig von Ficker that 'the point of [the Tractatus] is ethical', in that openness to the world as a whole—openness to how things are as such and as a whole—emerges as fundamentally a practical, rather than theoretical achievement. 

Author Biography

Denis McManus, University of Southampton

Professor Denis McManus is a Professor of Philosophy at the University of Southampton. He is the author of The Enchantment of Words: Wittgenstein's Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus (Oxford University Press, 2006) and Heidegger and the Measure of Truth (Oxford University Press, 2012).  He is the editor of Wittgenstein and Scepticism (Routledge, 2004) and Heidegger, Authenticity and the Self (Routledge 2015).

References

WORKS BY WITTGENSTEIN

CV Culture and Value (1998). ed. G. H. von Wright, trans. P. Winch, revised second edition edited by A. Pichler, Oxford: Blackwell.

CL Ludwig Wittgenstein: Cambridge Letters (1995). eds. B. F. McGuinness and G. H. von Wright, Oxford: Blackwell.

LE “A Lecture on Ethics” (1993). In: Philosophical Occasions, ed. J. Klagge and A. Nordmann, Indianapolis: Hackett.

LLF “Letters to Ludwig von Ficker” (1979), trans. B. Gillette, ed. A. Janik. In: C. G. Luckhardt (ed.) Wittgenstein: Sources and Perspectives, Hassocks, Sussex: The Harvester Press.

LO Letters to C. K. Ogden (1973), ed. G. H. von Wright, Oxford and London: Blackwell and Routledge and Kegan Paul.

NB Notebooks 1914–16 (1979). ed. G. H. von Wright and G. E. M. Anscombe, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe, Oxford: Blackwell.

PI Philosophical Investigations (1967). ed. G. E. M. Anscombe and R. Rhees, trans. G. E. M. Anscombe, Oxford: Blackwell.

PNB Private Notebooks 1914–16 (2022). ed. and trans. M. Perloff, New York: Norton and Co.

PR Philosophical Remarks (1975). ed. R. Rhees, trans. R. Hargreaves and R. White, Oxford: Blackwell.

TLP Tractatus Logico–Philosophicus (1922). trans. C. K. Ogden, London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

WORKS BY OTHERS

Anscombe, G. E. M. (1971). An Introduction to Wittgenstein's Tractatus, London: Hutchinson.

Anscombe, G. E. M. (2000). Intention, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Anscombe, G. E. M. (2011). “The Simplicity of the Tractatus”. In: From Plato to Wittgenstein, ed. M. Geach and L. Gormally, Exeter: Imprint Academic.

St Augustine (1961). Confessions, trans. R. S. Pine–Coffin, Harmondsworth: Penguin.

Austin, John L. (1961). “Agathon and Eudaimonia in the Ethics of Aristotle”. In: Philosophical Papers, J. O. Urmson and G. J. Warnock (eds.), Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Broadie, Sarah (1991). Ethics with Aristotle, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Calvin, Calvin, John (1956) On God and Political Duty, ed. J. McNeill, Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill Educational Publishing.

Cavell, Stanley (1979). The Claim of Reason, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Cavell, Stanley (1987). Disowning Knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Conant, James and Diamond, Cora (2004). “On Reading the Tractatus Resolutely: Reply to Meredith Williams and Peter Sullivan”. In: Kölbel and Weiss (2004), pp. 42-97. DOI: 10.4324/9780203601389-10.

Descartes, René (1931). The Philosophical Works of Descartes, two volumes, trans E. S. Haldane and G. R. T. Ross, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Engelmann, Paul (1967). Letter from Ludwig Wittgenstein; with a Memoir, trans. L. Furtmüller, ed. B. F. McGuinness, Oxford: Blackwell.

Frege, Gottlob (1879). “Begriffsschrift, a formula language, modelled upon that of arithmetic, for pure thought”, trans. S. Bauer–Mengelberg, From Frege to Gödel: a source book in mathematical logic, 1879–1931, ed. J. van Heijenoort, Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, 1967, pp. 1–82.

Frege, Gottlob (1897). “Logic, trans. P. Long and R. White, G. Frege, Posthumous Writings, ed. H. Hermes, F. Kambartel and F. Kaulbach, Oxford: Blackwell, 1979, pp. 126–151.

Glock, Hans–Johann (1996). A Wittgenstein Dictionary, Oxford: Blackwell.

Hacker, P. M. S. (1986). Insight and Illusion, revised edition, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Hacker, P. M. S. (1996) Wittgenstein – Mind and Will: Volume Four of an Analytic Commentary on the Philosophical Investigations, Oxford: Blackwell.

Jannik, Allan and Toulmin, Stephen (1973) Wittgenstein’s Vienna, New York: Simon and Schuster.

Kant, Immanuel (1961). Critique of Pure Reason, trans. N. Kemp Smith, London: Macmillan.

Klagge, James C. (2022) Tractatus in Context, London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9781003030072.

Kölbel, Max and Weiss, Bernhard (eds.) (2004). Wittgenstein’s Lasting Significance, London: Routledge. DOI: 10.4324/9780203601389.

Kraut, Richard (1993). “In Defence of the Grand End”, Ethics 103, pp. 361–374.

Lyons, William (2009). “Conscience – An Essay in Moral Psychology”, Philosophy 84: pp. 477-494. DOI: 10.1017/s0031819109990076.

McGuinness, Brian F. (1988). Wittgenstein: A Life – Young Ludwig 1889–1921, London: Duckworth.

McManus, Denis (2006) The Enchantment of Words: Wittgenstein’s Tractatus Logico–Philosophicus, Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199288021.003.0001.

McManus, Denis (2014). “Austerity, Psychology, and the Intelligibility of Nonsense”, Philosophical Topics 39, pp. 161–199. DOI: 10.5840/philtopics201442223.

McManus, Denis (2015). “Wittgenstein, Moore and the Lure of Transcendental Idealism”, Philosophical Topics 43, pp. 125–48. DOI: 10.5840/philtopics2015431/29.

McManus, Denis (2019). “On a Judgment of One’s Own: Heideggerian Authenticity, Standpoints, and All Things Considered”, Mind 128, pp. 1181–1204. DOI: 10.1093/mind/fzx045.

McManus, Denis (2020). “Heidegger and Aristotle on Reason, Choice, and Self–Expression: On Decisionists, Nihilists and Pluralists”, in M. Burch and I. McMullin (eds.) Transcending Reason: Heidegger on Rationality, London: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 125–149.

Monk, Ray (1990) Ludwig Wittgenstein: The Duty of Genius, London: Vintage.

Moore, Adrian W. (2003). “Ineffability and Nonsense”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 77, pp. 169–193. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8349.00108.

Moore, George E. (1903). Principia Ethica, revised edition, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1993.

Morris, Michael (2008). Wittgenstein and the Tractatus, London: Routledge.

Müller, Anselm F. (1989), “Absolute Requirement: A Central Topic in Wittgenstein’s Lecture on Ethics”, Revue Internationale de Philosophie 43: pp. 217–248.

Niebuhr, Reinhold (1987). The Essential Reinhold Niebuhr: Selected Essays and Addresses, ed. R. M. Brown, New Haven: Yale University Press.

Price, Anthony W. (2011). Virtue and Reason in Plato and Aristotle, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Russell, Bertrand (1913) Theory of Knowledge, London: George Allen and Unwin, 1984. DOI: 10.1017/s0012217300038300.

Russell, Bertrand (1903) Principles of Mathematics, London: Allen and Unwin, 1937.

Russell, Bertrand (1914) “Mysticism and Logic”, reprinted in his Mysticism and Logic, London: Routledge, 1994.

Sullivan, Peter (2003) “Ineffability and Nonsense”, Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 77: pp. 195–223. DOI: 10.1111/1467-8349.00109.

Sullivan, Peter (2004) “What is the Tractatus about?”. In: Kölbel and Weiss (2004), pp. 41-54. DOI: 10.4324/9780203601389-9.

Wiggins, David (1987). Needs, Values, Truth, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wiland, Eric (2012). Reasons, London: Bloomsbury.

Williams, Bernard (1981). “Internal and External Reasons”. In: Moral Luck, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Published
2022-12-31
How to Cite
[1]
McManus, D. 2022. Ethics as a Condition of the World: The Inexpressible, the Transcendental and the Point of the Tractatus. Disputatio. 11, 23 (Dec. 2022), 243-286. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7963884.