On the permanence of metaphysics

  • Katia Santos Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA), Brasil.
Keywords: Analytic Ontology, Nature of Metaphysics, Possibility of Metaphysics, Metaphysical Problems, Paraconsistency

Abstract

In the last decades, we have witnessed a renaissance of discussions on metaphysics within the Analytic Philosophy. Nowadays, philosophers of this tradition started a refoundation movement, in which they try to establish its concept and possibility. Concerning the concept, metaphysics is identified with ontology, which objective would be to outline the fundamental structure of reality. They believe that it retakes the Aristotelian project of searching for being and, at the same time that refuse the Kantian Idealism, they believe they are founding the possibility of a transcendent metaphysics. In this article, we have three objectives. In the first place, we raise some questions that arise regarding this concept of metaphysics. Second, we criticize the arguments about its possibility. Finally, we present our own position about its nature and possibility, in dialogue with Paul Gilbert’s discussion, in «Permanência da metafísica». Gilbert defends that metaphysics remains alive in the sense of the Greek term «meta», not contemplated by the technical and scientific perspective of analytic ontology. Considering his conception as correct, we add that metaphysics is constituted by transcendent problems, which are the reason for the reflections of this field, and responsible for the effort to overcome the empirical towards metaphysics.

Author Biography

Katia Santos, Universidade Federal Rural do Semi-Árido (UFERSA), Brasil.

Katia Santos is a PhD in Philosophy at Universidade de São Paulo and a professor at UFERSA. Main research objects: theories of knowledge, fundamental questions of metaphysics, realism and idealism, relations between logic and metaphysics, principle of non-contradiction, dilemmas, antinomies and metaphysical paradoxes. Author of A antinomia da teoria do conhecimento de Schopenhauer. São Paulo: Loyola, 2020.

References

Angioni, Lucas (2008). As noções aristotélicas de substância e essência: o livro VII da Metafísica de Aristóteles. Campinas: Editora da Unicamp.

Aristóteles (2007). Metafísica. Livros IV e VI. Clássicos da Filosofia: Cadernos de Tradução. Translation, introduction and notes by Lucas Angioni. Campinas: IFCH/UNICAMP.

Aubenque, Pierre (1977). Le problème de l’être chez Aristote. Paris: PUF.

Barnes, Jonathan (Ed.) (1999). The Cambridge Companion to Aristotle. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Carnap, Rudolf (1932). «Überwindung der Metaphysik durch Logische Analyse der Sprache». Erkenntnis II, pp. 220-241.

Cassirer, Ernst (2000). El problema del conocimiento. Vol. II. 5ª reimpr. Trad. cast. Wenceslao Roces. México: Fondo de Cultura Económica.

Da Costa, Newton C. A. (1974). «On the theory of inconsistente formal systems». Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic. Vol. XV, N. 4, Oct. 1974, NDJFAM, pp. 497-510.

Da Costa, Newton C. A. (1993). Sistemas formais inconsistentes. Curitiba: UFPR.

Da Costa, Newton C. A.; KRAUSE, Décio; BUENO, Otávio (2007). Paraconsistent logics and paraconsistency. Handbook of Philosophy of Science. Philosophy of Logic. North Holland: Elsevier.

D Costa, Newton C. A. (2008). Ensaio sobre os fundamentos da lógica. 3ª ed. São Paulo: Hucitec.

Gilbert, Paul, S. J. (2016). «Permanência da Metafísica». Translated from Italian by Ibrahim Vitor de Oliveira. Revista Argumentos 8, n. 15, Fortaleza, jan.-jun. 2016, pp. 159-174.

Kahn, Charles (1966). «Sobre o verbo grego “ser” e o conceito de ser». In: Sobre o verbo grego ser e o conceito de ser. Cadernos de Tradução I. Translated by Maura Iglésias et ali. Rio de Janeiro: Núcleo de Estudos de Filosofia Antiga/ PUC, 1997.

Kahn, Charles, H. (2003). The verb “be” in ancient greek. With a new introductory essay. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett.

Kant, Immanuel (1781). Kritik der Reinen Vernunft. Kant’s Gesammelte Schriften. Band IV. Herausgegeben von der Königlich Preuβischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Berlim: Georg Reimer, 1903.

Kant, Immanuel (1787). Kritik der Reinen Vernunft. Zweite Auflage. Kant’s Gesammelte Schriften. Band III. Herausgegeben von der Königlich Preuβischen Akademie der Wissenschaften. Berlim: Georg Reimer, 1904.

Liebmann, Otto (1912). Kant und die Epigonen. Neudrucke seltener philosophischer Werke. Herausgegeben von der Kantgesellschaft. Band II. Berlin: Verlag von Reuther & Reichard.

Longuenesse, Béatrice (1993). Kant et le pouvoir de juger. Sensibilité et discursivité dans l’Analytique transcendantale de la Critique de la raison pure. Paris: PUF.

Loux, Michael J.; ZIMMERMAN, Dean Zimmerman (2003). The Oxford Handbook of Metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Loux, Michael J. (2006). Metaphysics: a contemporary introduction. London/New York: Routledge.

Lowe, Edward Jonathan (2001). The possibility of metaphysics: substance, identity and time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lowe, Edward Jonathan (2002). A survey of metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lowe, Edward Jonathan (2014). «Recent Advances in Metaphysics: Ontological Categories and Categorial Schemes». Disputatio. Philosophical Research Bulletin 4, 2014, pp.89-112. Originally published as Lowe, Edward J. «Recent Advances in Metaphysics». Facta Philosophica 5 (2003), p. 3-24.

Lowe, Edward Jonathan (2016). «Metaphysics as the Science of Essence». Analysis. Claves de Pensamiento Contemporáneo 19, no. 7: pp. 1–30.

Owen, G. E. L. (1960). «Logic and Metaphysics in some earlier works of Aristotle». In: Owen, G. E. L.; Nussbaum, Martha (Ed.). (1986). Logic, Science and Dialetic: Collected Papers in Greek Philosophy. Ithaca/NY: Cornell University Press. [Trad. port.: «Lógica e metafísica em algumas obras iniciais de Aristóteles». Translation by Luis Márcio Nogueira Fontes. In: Zingano, Marco (org.). (2005). Sobre a Metafísica de Aristóteles: textos selecionados. São Paulo: Odysseus].

Plato (1975). Phaedo. Translation with notes by David Gallop. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Renouvier, Charles. (1899). Du principe de relativité. L’Anée Philosophique 9, pp. 1-19.

Renouvier, Charles. (1901). Les dilemmes de la métaphysique pure. Nouvelle Édition. Paris: Felix Alcan, 1927.

Ross, David (1995). Aristotle. 6th. Ed. London/New York: Routledge.

Santos, Katia. Os dilemas da metafísica segundo Charles Renouvier. Cadernos de Filosofia Alemã. v. 25, n. 1, jan.-jun.2020, pp. 80-104. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.11606/issn.2318-9800.v25i1p89-104.

Santos, Katia. (2020) A antinomia da teoria do conhecimento de Schopenhauer. São Paulo: Loyola.

Vélez León, Paulo (2015). «¿Ontología u Ontologías?». Disputatio. Philosophical Research Bulletin 4, no. 5: pp. 299–339.

Vélez León, Paulo (2016). «Sobre el significado de la metafísica en Kant». Disputatio. Philosophical Research Bulletin 5, no. 6: pp. 267–281.

Zingano, Marco (2003). «Notas sobre o princípio de não contradição em Aristóteles». Cadernos de História e Filosofia da Ciência. Campinas, Série 3, v. 13, n. 1, p. 7-32, jan.-jun., 2003.

Zingano, Marco (Org.) (2005). Sobre a Metafísica de Aristóteles: textos selecionados. São Paulo: Odysseus.
Published
2020-12-31
How to Cite
[1]
Santos, K. 2020. On the permanence of metaphysics. Disputatio. 9, 15 (Dec. 2020), 53-89. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4625183.
Section
Articles and Essays