Suárez and Salamanca: Magister and Locus of Pure Nature

  • Victor M. Salas Sacred Heart Major Seminary, Detroit, USA
Keywords: Nature, Grace, Supernatural End, Natural End, Beatific Vision

Abstract

This paper explores the thinking of some Salamancan theologians regarding the notion of pure nature. In particular, I address Suárez’s thinking on this subject and locate it within the context of the debate over whether human beings have a desire for the beatific vision. Insofar as a number of Thomists and Suárez think that there is no natural desire for a supernatural end, human beings are, by nature, left only with a desire for natural beatitude. The theoretical possibility of a human nature created without any order to a supernatural end and also falling outside the economy of grace becomes a subject of speculation that serves to illuminate something about created nature itself.

Author Biography

Victor M. Salas, Sacred Heart Major Seminary, Detroit, USA

Victor M. Salas is an Associate Professor of Philosophy at Sacred Heart Major Seminary, Detroit, USA). He
received a Ph.D. in philosophy from Saint Louis University (2008) and conducts research on late scholastic
metaphysics, especially that of Francisco Suárez. Among some of his works, he has been the co-editor of A
Companion to Francisco Suárez (Brill, 2015) and John Doyle's Collected Studies on Francisco Suárez, S.J., 1548-
1617 (Leuven University Press, 2010). His articles have appeared in The Thomist, Journal for the History of
Philosophy, Res Philosophica, Pensamiento, The Modern Schoolman, to name a few.

References

Aquinas, Thomas (1888). Summa theologiae. Rome: Ex Typographia Polyglotta.

Aristotle (1941). Metaphysics in, ed. Richard McKeon, The Basic Works of Aristotle. New York, NY: Randhom House.

Aristotle (1941). Nicomachean Ethics in, ed. Richard McKeon, The Basic Works of Aristotle. New York, NY: Randhom House.

Báñez, Domingo (1614). Scholastica commentaria in primam partem Angelici Doctoris. Douay: Apud Petrum Borremannum Typographum Iuratum.

Cajetan (1888). In Summam theologiam. Rome: Ex Typographia Polyglotta.

De Lubac, Henri (1946). Surnaturel: Études historique. Paris: Aubier.

De Lubac, Henri (1948). “Duplex hominis beatitude.” Recherches de science religieuse 35: pp. 290–99.

Duns Scotus, John (1997). Quaestiones super libros Metaphysicorum Aristotelis, eds. R. Andrews, G. Etzkorn, G. Gál, R. Green, F. Kelley, G. Marcil, T. Noone, R. Wood. St. Bonaventure, NY: The Franciscan Institute.

Feingold, Lawrence (2010). The Natural Desire to See God According to St. Thomas Aquinas and His Interpreters. Ave Maria, FL: Sapientia Press.

Garrigou–Lagrange, Reginald (1928). “L’appétit naturel et la puissance obédientielle.” Revue thomiste 11: pp. 474–78.

Garrigou–Lagrange, Reginald (1945). De revelatione per Ecclesiam catholicam proposita. Rome: Ferrari, vol. 1.

Medina, Bartolomé de (1602). Expositio in primam secundae Angelici Doctoris. Venice: Apud Damianum Zenarium.

Soto, Domingo de (1549). De natura et gratia. Paris: Apud Ioannem Foucher.

Suárez, Francisco (1856). De ultimo finis hominis. Paris: Luis Vivès.

Suárez, Francisco (1857). De gratia. Paris: Luis Vivès.

Suárez, Francisco (1861). Disputationes metaphysicae. Paris: Luis Vivès.
Published
2018-12-31
How to Cite
[1]
Salas, V.M. 2018. Suárez and Salamanca: Magister and Locus of Pure Nature. Disputatio. 7, 8 (Dec. 2018), a026. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3566822.