Two Forms of Quietism: What can be Spoken About in Philosophy?

  • Manuel de Pinedo Universidad de Granada, Spain
Keywords: Wittgenstein, John McDowell, Particularism, Rule Following, Externalism

Abstract

En este trabajo exploro dos formas de ser quietista en filosofía y las relaciono con la filosofía de Wittgenstein y McDowell. En un primer sentido, el quietismo podría entenderse como la obligación de permanecer silencioso con respecto a las cuestiones que más valoramos. Los aforismos finales del Tractatus parecen apuntar en esta dirección. El segundo sentido es una negativa a producir teorías filosóficas con respecto a cuestiones generales y abstractas como el significado o el pensamiento. McDowell ha presentado una lectura en esta última línea de las Investigaciones y ha seguido esta dirección en la mayoría de su propia filosofía. Discuto algunas consecuencias de este segundo enfoque para el seguimiento de reglas, el externismo sobre lo mental y el particularismo ético e intento mostrar que hay muchas posibilidades de realizar investigación filosófica de importancia incluso tras el abandono de las grandes pretensiones teóricas.

Author Biography

Manuel de Pinedo, Universidad de Granada, Spain

Manuel de Pinedo is a lecturer at the Filosofía I department, University of Granada, Spain. He obtained his PhD at Sussex University (UK, 2000) and joined the University of Granada, where he still works, as a Ramón y Cajal fellow. His research has focused on a variety of issues from the philosophy of mind, biology and the cognitive sciences, to epistemology and metaphysics. He has published in journals such as Synthese, Biology & Philosophy, Theoria, Teorema, International Journal of Philosophical Studies, Frontiers in Psychology or Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences. He is proud to collaborate with a good number of academics and philosophers, including several present and former PhD students. At the moment he is very much committed to the political turn in analytic philosophy and leads, with María José Frápolli and Neftalí Villanueva, a very active research group.

References

Brandom, Robert B. (2009). Reason in Philosophy: Animating Ideas, Cambridge, MA.: Belknap Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674053618

Brandom Robert B. (2018). «Some Strands of Wittgenstein’s Normative Pragmatism, and Some Strains of his Semantic Nihilism». Disputatio. Philosophical Research Bulletin 8, no. 9: pp. 81–109.

Burge, Tyler (1979). «Individualism and the mental». Midwest Studies in Philosophy 4:1: pp. 73-121. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4975.1979.tb00374.x

Davidson, Donald (1982). «Rational animals». In Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001, pp. 95-105. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/0198237537.003.0007

Davidson, Donald (1986). «A nice derangement of epitaphs». In: Truth, Language, and History, Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2005, pp. 89-107. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/019823757X.003.0007

Davidson, Donald (1991), «Three varieties of knowledge». In Subjective, Intersubjective, Objective, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001, pp. 205-20. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1358246100007748

Davidson, Donald (1994). «Donald Davidson». In S. Guttenplan (ed.), A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind, Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 231-236. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/b.9780631199960.1995.00007.x (not found)

Evans, Gareth (1982). The Varieties of Reference, John McDowell, ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Finkelstein, David H. (2008). Expression and the Inner, Cambridge, MA.; Harvard University Press.

Fodor, Jerry A. (1987), Psychosemantics, Cambridge, MA.: The MIT Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/5684.001.0001

Hornsby, Jennifer (2000). «Feminism and philosophy of language: Communicative speech acts». In M. Fricker y J. Hornsby (eds.), Cambridge Companion to Feminism in Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CCOL0521624517.006

Kripke, Saul (1980). Naming and Necessity, Oxford: Blackwell.

Kripke, Saul (1982). Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language, Oxford: Blackwell.

Kukla, Rebecca and Mark Lance (2009). ‘Yo!’ and ‘Lo!’: The Pragmatic Topography of the Space of Reasons, Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.

Lance, Marc and Rebecca Kukla (2010). «Perception, language, and the first person», en B. Weiss y J.Wanderer (eds.), Reading Brandom on Making it Explicit, London: Routledge, pp. 115-128.

Luntley, Michel (1999). Contemporary Philosophy of Thought: Truth, World, Content, Oxford: Blackwell.

McDowell, John (1977). «On the sense and reference of a proper name». In Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998, pp. 171-98.

McDowell, John (1984). «Wittgenstein on a following rule». In Mind, Value and Reality, Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press, 1998, pp. 221-62.

McDowell, John (1986). «Singular thought and the extent of inner space». In Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality, Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press, 1998, pp. 228-59.

McDowell, John (1994). Mind and World. Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press.

McDowell, John (1995). «Knowledge and the Internal». In Meaning, Knowledge, and Reality, Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press, 1998, pp. 395-413.

McDowell, John (2002). «How not to read Philosophical Investigations: Brandom’s Wittgenstein». In The Engaged Intellect, Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press, 2009, pp. 96-111.

Murdoch, Iris (1961). «Against dryness». In Existentialists and Mystics, (ed.) P. Conradi, London: Penguin, 1999, pp. 287-95.

Murdoch, Iris (1962). «The idea of perfection». In Existentialists and Mystics, (ed.) P. Conradi, London: Penguin, 1999, pp. 299-336.

Pinedo, Manuel (2004). «Truth matters: Normativity in thought and knowledge». Theoria, 19: pp. 137-154.

Pinedo, Manuel (2010). «En busca del agente racional». Teorema 39: pp. 147-161.

Pinedo, Manuel and Hilan Bensusan (2006). «Una cura para la disyuntivitis: El papel de la experiencia en nuestra visión del mundo» EpistemeNS, 26: pp. 41-56.

Pinedo, Manuel (2018). «Contenido conceptual y sentidos de re». In Cuestiones de la filosofía del lenguaje, (ed.) D. Pérez Chico, Zaragoza, Prensas Universitarias de Zaragoza, pp. 235-258.

Putnam, Hilary (1975),« The meaning of “meaning”», en Mind, Language and Reality. Philosophical Paper, vol.2, Cambridge, CA.: Cambridge University Press, pp. 215-71. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511625251.014

Ramsey, Frank. P. (1928). «General propositions and causality». In F. P. Ramsey: Philosophical Papers, (ed.) D. H. Mellor, Cambridge, CA.: Cambridge University Press, 1990.

Recanati, François (1993). Direct Reference, Oxford: Blackwell.

Sloterdijk, Peter (1988). Zur Welt kommen – Zur Sprachen kommen, Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.

Weil, Simone: (1943) «Draft for a statement of human obligations» trans. by Richard Rees, Simone Weil: An Anthology, ed. Siân Miles, Nueva York: Grove Press, 1986, pp. 201-210.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1921). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, trans. from: Logisch-philosophische Abhandlung by Enrique Tierno Galván. Madrid: Revista de Occidente, 1957

Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1953). Investigaciones filosóficas, Trans. from: Philosophische Untersuchungen by A. García Suárez y U. Moulines. Mexico: Crítica, 1986

Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1958). The Blue and Brown Books, Nueva York: Harper & Row.

Wright, Crispin (1989), «Critical notice of Colin McGinn»: Wittgenstein on Meaning, Mind 98: pp. 289-305. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/mind/XCVIII.390.289.

Published
2019-06-30
How to Cite
[1]
de Pinedo García, M. 2019. Two Forms of Quietism: What can be Spoken About in Philosophy?. Disputatio. 8, 9 (Jun. 2019), 173-192. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3236912.