How to behave virtuously in an irrational world

  • Massimo Pigliucci City University of New York, United States
Keywords: Pseudoscience, Science Denialism, Aristotle's Rhetoric, Virtue Epistemology

Abstract

It is no secret that we inhabit an increasingly irrational world, plagued by rampant pseudoscience, science denialism, post-truths and fake news. Or perhaps, human nature being what it is, we have always lived in such a world and we are now simply more keenly aware of it because of easy and widespread access to social media. Moreover, the stakes are higher, as pseudoscience in the form of the anti-vax movement imperils the lives of many, while climate change denialism literally risks a collapse of the human ecosystem. So how do we deal with the problem? How do we talk to otherwise perfectly reasonable and functional people who nevertheless espouse all sorts of nonsense — and vote accordingly? In this paper I will explore a couple of real life conversations among many that I have had with believers in pseudoscience, and then present and discuss virtue epistemology as one approach to ameliorate the problem. No silver bullets are available, unfortunately, but it is our intellectual and moral duty to keep, as Carl Sagan famously put it, the candle of reason lit even when surrounded by the darkness of unreason.

Author Biography

Massimo Pigliucci, City University of New York, United States

MASSIMO PIGLIUCCI is the K.D. Irani Professor of Philosophy at the City College of New York. His books include A Handbook for New Stoics: How to Thrive in a World Out of Your Control (The Experiment, with Greg Lopez), Nonsense on Stilts: How to Tell Science from Bunk (University of Chicago Press), and How to Be a Stoic: Using Ancient Philosophy to Live a Modern Life (Basic Books). More by Massimo at stoicbutnotasage.net.

References

Anscombe, G.E.M. (1958) Modern moral philosophy. Philosophy 33:1-19.

Axtell, G. (2000) Knowledge, Belief and Character: Readings in Virtue Epistemology. Rowman and Littlefield.

Bertsch McGrayne, S. (2012) The Theory That Would Not Die: How Bayes’ Rule Cracked the Enigma Code, Hunted Down Russian Submarines, and Emerged Triumphant from Two Centuries of Controversy. Yale University Press.

Boudry, M., Paglieri, F. and Pigliucci, M. (2015) The fake, the flimsy, and the fallacious: demarcating arguments in real life. Argumentation 29(4):431-456.

Chalmers, A.F. (2013) What Is This Thing Called Science? Fourth Edition, Hackett.

Correia, V. (2011) Biases and fallacies: the role of motivated irrationality in fallacious reasoning. Cogency: Journal of reasoning and argumentation, 3(1):107-126.

Eve, R.A. and Dunn, D. (1990) Psychic powers, astrology & creationism in the classroom? Evidence of pseudoscientific beliefs among high school biology & life science teachers. The American Biology Teacher 52(1):10-21.

Goode, E. (2002) Education, scientific knowledge, and belief in the paranormal. Skepticla Inquirer, Jan/Feb, pp. 24-27.

Kallery, M. (2001) Early-years dducators’ attitudes to science and pseudo-science: the case of astronomy and astrology. European Journal of Teacher Education 24(3):329-342.

Lachman, S.J., Bass, A.R. (1985) A Direct Study of Halo Effect. Journal of Psychology 119(6):535–540.

Lundstrom, M. (2007) Students’ beliefs in pseudoscience. Malmo University Electronic Publishing, online at http://muep.mau.se/handle/2043/4701 (accessed on 19 February 2019).

Oreskes, N. and Conway, E.M. (2011) Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. Bloomsbury Press.

Pigliucci, M. (2009) An extended synthesis for evolutionary biology. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1168:218–228.

Pronin, E., Lin, D. Y., and Lee, R. (2002) The bias blind spot: Perceptions of bias in self versus others. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(3):369-381.

Sagan, C. (1997) The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark. Ballantine Books.

Sinatra, G.M., Kienhues, D., and Hofer, B.K. (2014) Addressing challenges to public understanding of science: epistemic cognition, motivated reasoning, and conceptual change. Educational Psychologist 49(2):123-138.

Sprenger, J. (2018) The objectivity of Subjective Bayesianism. European Journal for Philosophy of Science 8(3):539-558.

Smith, E. and Morowitz, H.J. (2016) The Origin and Nature of Life on Earth: The Emergence of the Fourth Geosphere. Cambridge University Press.

Stanovich, K.E., West, R.F., and Toplak, M.E. (2013) Myside bias, rational thinking, and intelligence. Current Directions in Psychological Science 22(4), https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721413480174.

Walker, W.R., Hoekstra, S.J., and Vogl, R.J. (2002) Science education is no guarantee of skepticism. Skeptic 9(3):24.

West, R.F., Meserve, R.J., and Stanovich, K.E. (2012) Cognitive sophistication does not attenuate the bias blind spot. Personality and Social Psychology, 103(3):506-519.

Published
2020-06-30
How to Cite
[1]
Pigliucci, M. 2020. How to behave virtuously in an irrational world. Disputatio. 9, 13 (Jun. 2020), 429-447. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3567251.