The Long Shadow of Semantic Platonism, Part III
Additional Illustrations, from a Collection of Classic Essays
Abstract
The present article is the third part of a trilogy of papers, devoted to analysing the influence of semantic Platonism on contemporary philosophy of language. In Part I (Picazo 2021), the discussion was set out by examining a number of typical traces of Platonism in semantic theory since Frege. In Part II (Picazo 2021a), additional illustrations of such traces were provided, taken from a collection of recent commissioned essays on the philosophy of language (Schantz 2012). The present part is devoted to providing yet additional illustrations of such traces, taken from a collection of classic essays on the subject: the book Modern Philosophy of Language, edited by Maria Baghramian in 1998. We shall, thus, describe a number of examples in which the influence of semantic Platonism on these essays can be felt. Prominent among these examples are the confusion between sentences and propositions (and related confusions), the avoidant attitude with respect to basic aspects of linguistic meaning, the overuse of analytic methodology for semantic research, the adoption of a background Platonic metaphysics of meanings and the overreaction against semantic Platonism and germane views, witnessing an inverse influence (‘by opposition’) from these views.
References
Burge, T. (1989): ‘Wherein is Language Social?’. In Baghramian (1998), pp. 328–347 (first published in 1989, in A. George (ed.), Reflections on Chomsky).
Carnap, R. (1950): ‘Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology’. In Baghramian (1998), pp. 68–85 (first published in 1950, in Review Internationale de Philosophie).
Chomsky, N. (1972): ‘Form and Meaning in Natural Languages’. In Baghramian (1998), pp. 294–308 (first published in 1972, in N. Chomsky, Language and Mind, 2nd ed.).
Davidson, D. (1967): ‘The Logical Form of Action Sentences’. In his book Essays on Actions and Events, 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2001, pp. 105–122 (first published in 1967, in N. Rescher (ed.), The Logic of Decision and Action).
Davidson, D. (1974): ‘Belief and the Basis of Meaning’. In Baghramian (1998), pp. 165–177 (first published in 1974, in Synthese).
Donnellan, K.S. (1966): ‘Reference and Definite Descriptions’. In Baghramian (1998), pp. 181–200 (first published in 1966, in Philosophical Review).
Dummett, M. (ms1978): ‘What Do I Know When I Know a Language?’ In Baghramian (1998), pp. 312–324 (paper read and distributed at the Centenary Celebrations of the Stockholm University in 1978; first published in 1996, in M. Dummett, The Seas of Language).
Evans, G. (1982): Extract from ‘Proper Names’ [sections §§1–3]. In Baghramian (1998), pp. 248–265 (first published in 1982, in G. Evans, The Varieties of Reference, ed. by J. McDowell).
Frege, G. (1892): ‘On Sense and Reference’. In Baghramian (1998), pp. 6–25 (trans. by M. Black) (first published in German, in 1892).
Kripke, S. (1972): Naming and Necessity, rev. and enlarged ed., Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press, 1980 (1st ed. published in 1972).
Kripke, S. (1972a): Extract from Lecture I of (Kripke 1972) [from ‘Many people have said that the theory of Frege and Russell is false…’ to ‘For example, if various parts of a table are replaced, is it the same object?’]. In Baghramian (1998), pp. 205–221.
Kripke, S. (1977): ‘Speaker’s Reference and Semantic Reference’, Midwest Studies in Philosophy 2, no. 1: 255–276.
Marcus, R.B. (1990): ‘Some Revisionary Proposals about Belief and Believing’. In Baghramian (1998), pp. 268–289 (republished from chapter 15 of her 1993 book Modalities: Philosophical Essays; originally appeared in 1990, in a slightly different version, in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research).
Millikan, R.G. (1984): ‘Epilogue to Language, Thought, and Other Biological Categories’. In Baghramian (1998), pp. 351–359 (first published in her book of that title, in 1984).
Molière, J-B.P. (1673): The Imaginary Invalid, Auckland: The Floating Press, 2009.
Picazo, G. (2014): ‘Truths and Processes: A Critical Approach to Truthmaker Theory’, Philosophia 42, no. 3, pp. 713–739. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-014-9533-y.
Picazo, G. (2021): ‘The Long Shadow of Semantic Platonism, Part I: General Considerations’, Philosophia. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-020-00304-4.
Picazo, G. (2021a): ‘The Long Shadow of Semantic Platonism, Part II: Recent Illustrations’, Philosophia. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11406-021-00321-x.
Putnam, H. (1975): Extract from ‘The Meaning of “Meaning”’ [from the beginning of the paper to the end of the section on ‘Indexicality and rigidity’]. In Baghramian (1998), pp. 225–244 (‘The Meaning of “Meaning”’ was published for the first time in 1975, in K. Gunderson (ed.), Language, Mind and Knowledge).
Quine, W.v.O. (1981): Theories and Things. Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press.
Russell, B. (1919): ‘Descriptions and Incomplete Symbols’ (Lecture VI of The Philosophy of Logical Atomism). In Baghramian (1998), pp. 30–40 (first published in 1919, in The Monist).
Schantz, R. (ed.) (2012): Prospects for Meaning. Berlin: De Gruyter.
Strawson, P.F. (1950): ‘On Referring’, Mind 59, no. 235, pp. 320–344.
Tarski, A. (1944): ‘The Semantic Conception of Truth and the Foundations of Semantics’. In Baghramian (1998), pp. 44–63 (first published in 1944, in Philosophy and Phenomenological Research).
Wittgenstein, L. (1953): Philosophical Investigations, 4th rev. ed., trans. by G.E.M. Anscombe, P.M.S. Hacker and J. Schulte. Chichester, West Sussex: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009 (first edition published in 1953).
Wittgenstein, L. (1953a): Philosophical Investigations, paragraphs §§1–44. In Baghramian (1998), pp. 88–106 (trans. by G.E.M. Anscombe; extracted from the 1958 2nd ed. of Wittgenstein 1953; on the only occasion in which this entry is quoted here, in §6, the translation coincides word-for-word with that of the 4th rev. edition).
Copyright (c) 2021 © Disputatio
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
