Hume’s best Book: Why Hume called his Enquiry concerning the Principles of Morals ‘incomparably the best’ of everything he wrote

  • Wolfgang Kienzler Friedrich–Schiller–Universität, Jena, Germany
Keywords: Morals, Scepticism, Systematicity, Description, Obviousness

Abstract

In this article, I explore why Hume regarded his Enquiry concerning the Principles of Morals “incomparably the best” of everything he wrote, while this judgement of his is not confirmed at all by the rankings in popularity of his works. Hume’s main reason for this judgment was the conviction that regarding the principles of morals he had reached the most satisfying, systematical and evidently true results of all his work. I argue that the general rejection of Hume’s own judgement is based on prejudices that fail to take into account the way Hume himself thought that his works should be read. Hume’s wish to explain his “new and distinct notion of moral philosophy” led him to introduce many changes to this Enquiry even until few days before his death. Hume’s intention were to guide the reader thus to an understanding of his system of ethics, for he had become aware of the fact that, instead of using exact definitions, he should rely on natural descriptions and good examples to make his main point come out more clearly. Hume’s appeal to the obvious as a key to understanding seems to suggest that the Scottish philosopher was indeed “very far away from most of contemporary analytic philosophy.”

Author Biography

Wolfgang Kienzler, Friedrich–Schiller–Universität, Jena, Germany

PD Dr. Wolfang Kienzler is an adjunct professor and philosophical research associate at the Friedrich–Schiller–
Universität in Jena, Germany. His main topics of investigation and published works are the early analytical
philosophy, in particular, Frege, Wittgenstein and Carnap. Other areas of interest are the origins of transcendental philosophy, in particular as it is found in the works of Hume and Kant.

References

Baier, Annette C (2008). “Enquiry concerning the Principles of Morals: Incomparably the Best?” in: A Companion to Hume, E. S. Radcliffe, ed., Malden, MA and Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 293–320.

Hume, David (1748). Philosophical Essays concerning Human Understanding, London: Millar [PEHU]; reprinted: Hildesheim: Olms, 1986. from the 1768 edition titled Enquiry concerning Human Understanding. [EHU]

Hume, David (1751). An Enquiry concerning the Principles of Morals, London: Millar.

Hume, David (1882). The Philosophical Works, four volumes [EPM]; T.H. Green and T.H. Grose, eds., New Edition, London 1882, reprinted: Aalen: Scientia, 1964. [GG]

Hume, David (1888). Enquiries concerning Human Understanding and concerning the Principles of Morals [SB]; L.A. Selby–Bigge, ed., Oxford: Clarendon; third edition, P.H. Nidditch, ed., Clarendon: Oxford, 1975.

Hume, David (2006). An Enquiry concerning the Principles of Morals [CE]; The Clarendon Edition of the Works of David Hume, T.L. Beauchamp, ed., Oxford. Clarendon, 1998; Paperback Edition.

Hume, David (1998). An Enquiry concerning the Principles of Morals [SE]; Oxford Philosophical Texts. The complete editions for students, T.L. Beauchamp, ed., Oxford. Oxford University Press.

The Letters of David Hume [GL]; J.Y.T. Greig, ed., two volumes, Oxford. Clarendon, 1932.
Published
2018-12-31
How to Cite
[1]
Kienzler, W. 2018. Hume’s best Book: Why Hume called his Enquiry concerning the Principles of Morals ‘incomparably the best’ of everything he wrote. Disputatio. 7, 8 (Dec. 2018), a007. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2550986.
Section
Articles and Essays