The problem of the legitimate demos: a fragmentary exposition of an open debate

  • Alberto Manuel Hers Martínez LUISS Guido Carli, Italia
Keywords: Democracy, Migration, Secession, Suffrage, Borders

Abstract

During the last decades there has been a growing controversy within political philosophy about the legitimate limits of the demos. In this paper, I am going to explain briefly some of the solutions offered so far and assess how they work in three problems that involve the democratic boundary problem. My goal is to show that each problem may be solved best using a specific solution. By doing that, my aim is to show that it is unlikely that the controversy will be solved in the short term.

Author Biography

Alberto Manuel Hers Martínez, LUISS Guido Carli, Italia

Alberto Manuel Hers Martínez es doctorando en el Programa de Postgrado en Política en la Universidad LUISS Guido Carli (Italia), en donde desarrolla la tesis «La autodeterminación en el contexto de la despolitización». Posee un máster en Filosofía de las Ciencias Políticas y otro en Organización Internacional por la Universidad de Leiden. Además, tiene Máster en Estudios Sociales de la Ciencia por la Universidad de Oviedo.

References

Altman, Andrew y Wellman, Christopher Heath (2009). A Liberal Theory of International Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199564415.001.0001

Abizadeh, Arash (2008). «Democratic Theory and Border Coercion: No Right to Unilaterally Control Your Own Borders.» Political Theory 36 (1): pp. 37-65. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591707310090

Abizadeh, Arash (2010). «Democratic Legitimacy and State Coercion: A Reply to David Miller». Political Theory 38 (1): pp.121-130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0090591709348192

Abizadeh, Arash (2012). «On the Demos and Its Kin: Nationalism, Democracy, and the Boundary Problem». American Political Science Review 106 (4): pp. 867-882.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055412000421

Beckman, Ludvig. (2019) «Deciding the Demos: Three Conceptions of Democratic Legitimacy». Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 22 (4): pp. 412-431. https://doi.org/10.1080/13698230.2017.1390661

Domènech, Antoni. (2004). El Eclipse de la Fraternidad: una Revisión Republicana de la Tradición Socialista. Barcelona: Crítica.

Christiano, Thomas. (2006). «A Democratic Theory of Territory and Some Puzzles about Global Democracy». Journal of Social philosophy 37 (1): pp. 81-107.

Goodin, Robert E. (2007). «Enfranchising All Affected Interests, and Its Alternatives». Philosophy & Public Affairs 35 (1): pp. 40-68.

Goodin, Robert E. (2016) «Enfranchising All Subjected, Worldwide». International Theory 8 (3): pp. 365-389.

Honohan, Iseult (2014). «Domination and Migration: an Alternative Approach to the Legitimacy of Migration Controls». Critical Review of International social and political philosophy 17 (1): pp. 31-48.

Owen, David (2012). «Constituting the Polity, Constituting the Demos: on the Place of the All Affected Interests Principle in Democratic Theory and in Resolving the Democratic Boundary Problem». Ethics & Global Politics 5 (3): pp. 129-152. https://doi.org/10.3402/egp.v5i3.18617

Miller, David (2009). «Democracy's Domain». Philosophy & Public affairs 37 (3): pp. 201-228. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.2009.01158.x

Song, Sarah (2009). «Democracy and Noncitizen Voting Rights». Citizenship Studies 13 (6): pp. 607-620. https://doi.org/10.1080/13621020903309607

Song, Sarah (2012). «The Boundary Problem in Democratic Theory: Why the Demos Should Be Bounded by the State». International Theory 4 (1): pp. 39-68. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752971911000248

Stilz, Anna (2015). «Decolonization and self-determination». Social Philosophy and Policy 32 (1): pp. 1-24. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0265052515000059

Valentini, Laura (2014). «No Global Demos, no Global Democracy? A Systematization and Critique». Perspectives on Politics 12 (4): pp. 789-807. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592714002138

Verschoor, Marco. (2015) «The Quest for the Legitimacy of the People: A Contractarian Approach». Politics, Philosophy & Economics 14 (4): pp. 391-428. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470594X14564506

Whelan, Frederick G. (1984) «Prologue: Democratic theory and the boundary problem». Nomos 25: pp. 13-47.
Published
2021-03-30
How to Cite
[1]
Hers Martínez, A.M. 2021. The problem of the legitimate demos: a fragmentary exposition of an open debate. Disputatio. 10, 16 (Mar. 2021), 273-279. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4718958.
Section
Critical Notes