Ordinary fragmentation and the role of consciousness in Camus
Abstract
The work of Albert Camus continues to show unexpected scopes about the challenges that our human condition entails and the responsibility we have to attend to them. With the following lines, we want to offer, precisely, one of these Camusian features that allow us to recognize how a certain meaning of human existence is fragmented because of small contradictory experiences that end up disfiguring the image of a self–confident human subject and what he lives. In front of such experience of meaninglessness, critical judgment is required to describe those who work within the limits of their own condition and are forced to deal with it.
References
Camus, Albert (1957). El Hombre Rebelde. Buenos Aires: Losada.
Camus, Albert (1957). El Mito de Sísifo. Buenos Aires: Losada.
Camus, Albert (2008). «Jonás o el artista trabajando». En El Exilio y el Reino. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Camus, Albert (2008). «La piedra que crece». En El Exilio y el Reino. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Camus, Albert (2008). «La mujer adúltera». En El Exilio y el Reino. Madrid: Alianza Editorial.
Cuquerella, Inmaculada (2013). “Albert Camus et la réflexion sur le terrorisme aujourd’hui”. Synergies Espagne 6: pp. 175-186.
Habermas, Jürgen (1989). El discurso filosófico de la modernidad. Madrid: Taurus.
Herrera, Alberto (2014). “Sentir, reflexionar y testimoniar. Una aproximación a la postura ontológica en Albert Camus”. Scientia Helmantica. Revista internacional de Filosofía 3: pp. 155-175.
Kierkegaard, Sören (2007). El Concepto de la Angustia. Madrid: Alianza.
Kierkegaard, Sören (2010). Post Scriptum no científico y definitivo de Migajas Filosóficas. Salamanca: Sígueme.
Sartre, Jean-Paul (1985). El existencialismo es un humanismo. Ciudad de México: Ediciones Quinto Sol.
Copyright (c) 2020 © Disputatio
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.