Models of Experience: Towards an Empirical Husserlian Phenomenology
Abstract
The theory of science that Husserl developed in his Prolegomena establishes a formal semantic counterpart made up of formal semantic categories and a formal ontological counterpart made up of formal ontological categories. In the third of his Logical Investigations, Husserl sets about developing this a priori theory of the ways that parts of an object can be combined so as to be considered a whole. In this theory, he proposes, designs, and develops different formal relationships between different types of parts in order to account for different types of wholes. In this presentation, I put forward the following thesis: Husserl applies his own formal ontology to the phenomenological realm, which results in models of this realm. By «model», I mean the result of the application of a formal structure with known properties to a realm that one is seeking to know. As such, the validity of the model will depend on its being corroborated empirically. The textual evidence for this is to be found in the third of the Logical Investigations and in others texts by Husserl from throughout his life.
References
Husserl, Edmund (1975). Logische Untersuchungen. Erster Band: Prolegomena zur reinen Logik, editado por Elmar Holenstein. Hua. XVIII. Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff.
Husserl, Edmund (1984). Logische Untersuchunghen. Zweiter Band: Untersuchungen zur Phänomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis, editado por Ursula Panzer. Hua. XIX/1. The Hague, Boston, Lancaster: Martinus Nijhoff.
Husserl, Edmund (2002). Logische Untersuchungen. Ergänzungsband. Erster Teil: Entwürfe zur Umarbeitung der VI. Untersuchung und zur Vorrede für die Neuauflage der Logischen Untersuchungen (Sommer 1913), editado por Ulrich Melle. Hua. XX/1. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Husserl, Edmund (1983). Studien zur Arithmetik und Geometrie. Texte aus dem Nachlass (1886–1901), editado por I. Strohmeyer. Hua. XXI. The Hague, Boston, Lancaster: Martinus Nijhoff.
Benoist, Jocelyn (2001). Intentionalité et langage dans les Recherches Logiques de Husserl. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Falguera, José Luis (1992). «La noción de modelo en los análisis de la concepción estructuralista». Ágora 11 (1): pp. 97–104.
Falguera, José Luis (1993). «El enredo de los modelos en los análisis de las ciencias factuales». Ágora 12 (2): pp. 171–178.
Fine, Kit (1995). «Part–whole», en The Cambridge Companion to Husserl, editado por Barry Smith y David Woodruff Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 463–485. doi: 10.1017/CCOL0521430232
Frigg, Roman y Harmann, Stephan (2009). «Models in Science». en The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, editada por Edward N. Zalta. (Summer 2009 Edition). Stanford, CA: Stanford University. URL = http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2009/entries/models-science/.
Smith, Barry (1998). «The Basic Tools of Formal Ontology» en Formal Ontology in Information Systems, editado por Nicola Guarino. (Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications). Amsterdam, Oxford, Tokyo, Washington D.C.: IOS Press, pp. 19–28.
Suppes, Patrick (1960). «A Comparison of the Meaning and Uses of Models in Mathematics and the Empirical Sciences». Synthese 12: pp. 287–301. doi: 10.1007/BF00485107
Varzi, Achille y casati, Roberto (1999). Parts and Places. The Structures of Spatial Representation. Cambridge/ London: The MIT Press.
Copyright (c) 2016 Disputatio. Philosophical Research Bulletin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.