La mediación de lo inmediato:

Vittorio Perego

doi:10.5281/zenodo.13827097

Vittorio Perego Theological Faculty of Northern Italy

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13827097

Keywords: Witness, Phenomenology, Hermeneutics, Attestation

Abstract

Ricœur believes that it is not possible to elaborate a phenomenology of religion, since the religious phenomenon is always constituted within a historical-cultural horizon and in particular for the Judeo-Christian religion the mediation of Scripture is irreducible. In this paper we want to compare this position with Ricœur’s reflection on witness, understood as anthropological mediation necessary for the constitution of the specific sense of the experience of the absolute. Ricœur, referring to Nabert’s thesis, relates the idea of absolute to which the theoretical consciousness reaches (the original affirmation) with the experience of the absolute mediated by the witness. To avoid falling back into Hegelian absolute knowledge, the hermeneutic of witness must keep these two moments separate, which are ultimately reason and faith. The paper aims to highlight how the problematic aspect of Ricœur’s proposal lies in its transcendental approach. In fact, this prevents Ricœur from recognizing a truthful character to experience, insofar as the event of the witness is configured as a possible realization of what is already simply included in the reflective act.

Author Biography

Vittorio Perego, Theological Faculty of Northern Italy

VITTORIO PEREGO studied at the Catholic University of Milan, where he obtained his doctorate in Philosophy, and also studied in Freiburg in Breisgau and Paris. His research interests focus mainly on contemporary phenomenology, French philosophy and the relationship between philosophy and theology. He has published Finitezza e libertà. Heidegger interprete di Kant (2001), La fenomenologia francese tra metafisica e teologia (2004) and Foucault e Derrida. Tra fenomenologia e trascendentale (2018). He has translated texts by Lévinas and Derrida and is the author of numerous articles on the German and French phenomenological tradition.

References

JANICAUD, Dominique (1991). Le Tournant théologique de la phénoménologie française. Combas: Éd. de l’Éclat.

LÉVINAS, Emmanuel (1974). Autrement qu’être ou Au-delà de l’essence. La Haye: Nijhoff.

PEREGO, Vittorio (2020). «Derrida e la testimonianza come esperienza impossibile e necessaria». Teologia, n.o 4: 540-65.

PEREGO, Vittorio (2004). La fenomenologia francese tra metafisica e teologia. Milano: Vita e Pensiero.

RICŒUR, paul (2000). La mémoire, l’histoire, l’oubli. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.

RICŒUR, Paul (1991). «L’attestation: entre phénoménologie et ontologie». En Paul Ricœur Les métamorphoses de la raison herméneutique, editado por Jean Greisch y Richard Kearney, 381-403. Paris: Éditions du Cerf.

RICŒUR, Paul (1994). «Le statut de la Vorstellung dans la philosophie hégélienne de la religion». En Lectures 3. Aux frontières de la philosophie, 41-62. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.

RICŒUR, Paul (1994). «Emmanuel Lévinas, penseur du témoignage». En Lectures 3. Aux frontières de la philosophie, 81-104. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.

RICŒUR, Paul (1994). «L’herméneutique du témoignage». En Lectures 3. Aux frontières de la philosophie, 105-37. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.

Ricœur, Paul (1994). «Phénoménologie de la religion». En Lectures 3. Aux frontières de la philosophie, 263-71. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.

Ricœur, Paul (1990). Soi-même comme un autre. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.

The mediation of the immediate

Ricœur and the Phenomenology of Religion

Abstract

Author Biography

References

Journal indexed in