Algunos comentarios sobre la doctrina aristotélica de oposición y el cálculo proposicional
Resumen
En este trabajo desarrollamos algunas ideas de Williamson acerca de la contribución del cálculo proposicional para una mejor comprensión de la lógica aristotélica. En particular, el uso que hace de tablas de verdad al analizar la estructura de cuadro de oposiciones se aclara mediante una técnica simple: las relaciones de dependencia entre diferentes proposiciones nos permiten construir "tablas de verdad condicionadas". Aprovechando esta posibilidad, proponemos una nueva interpretación de varios pasajes del Órganon con relación a las oposiciones.
Referencias
Ackrill, J. L. (1963). Aristotle, Categories and De Interpretatione: Translated with Notes by J. L. Ackrill. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Allen, R. E. (1997). Plato's Parmenides. Revised edition. New Haven and London: Yale University Press.
Aranyosi, I. A. (2004). “Aristotelian Nonsubstantial Particulars,” Philosophical Writings, 26: 3–12.
Béziau, J. & Basti, G. (eds.) (2017). The Square of Opposition: A Cornerstone of Thought. Birkhäuser Cham. <https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-45062-9>
Béziau, J. & Giovagnoli, R. (eds.) (June 2016). Logica universalis 10, 2–3, Special Issue: The Vatican Square.
Béziau, J. & Jacquette, D. (eds.) (2012). Around and Beyond the Square of Opposition. Birkhäuser Basel. < https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-0348-0379-3>
Béziau, J. & Lemanski, J. (eds.) (March 2020). Logica universalis 14, 1, Special Issue: Cretan Square
Béziau, J. & Payette, G. (eds.) (March 2008). Logica universalis 2, 1.
Béziau, J. & Payette, G. (eds.) (2011). The Square of Opposition: A General Framework for Cognition. Peter Lang.
Beziau, J. & Read, S. (eds.) (2014). History and Philosophy of Logic 35, 4 <https://doi.org/10.1080/01445340.2014.917836>
Béziau, J. & Stamatios, G. (eds.) (2017). New Dimensions of the Square of Opposition. Philosophia. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2nrzhd7>
Béziau, J. & Vandoulakis, I. (eds.) (2022). The Exoteric Square of Opposition. The Sixth World Congress on the Square of Opposition. Birkhäuser Cham. <https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90823-2>
Cook, H. P. & Tredennick, H. (1962). Aristotle: The Categories. On Interpretation. Prior Analytics. Topica. With facing Greek and English pages. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Devereux, D. (1992). “Inherence and Primary Substance in Aristotle's Categories,” Ancient Philosophy, 12: 113–131. <https://doi.org/10.5840/ancientphil199212147>
Frede, M. (1987). Essays in Ancient Philosophy, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Matthews, G. B. (1989). “The Enigma of Categories 1a20ff and Why It Matters,” Apeiron 22 (4): 91–104. <https://doi.org/10.1515/APEIRON.1989.22.4.91>
McCall, S. (2012). “A History Of Connexivity,” in D. M. Gabbay, F. J. Pelletier, J. Woods (ed), Handbook of the History of Logic, 11: 415-449. North-Holland, <https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-52937-4.50008-3>
Mueller, I. (2014). Alexander of Aphrodisias: On Aristotle Prior Analytics 1.32–46. Bloomsbury.
Owen, G. E. L. (1965). “Inherence,” Phronesis, 10 (1): 97–105. <https://doi.org/10.1163/156852865X00095>
Smith, R. (1989). Aristotle's Prior Analytics. Translation with introduction, notes, and commentary. Indianapolis/Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.
Striker, G. (2009). Aristotle's Prior Analytics: Book I. Translation and commentary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Studtmann, P. (Spring 2021). “Aristotle's Categories,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.).
<https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2021/entries/aristotle-categories/>
Tredennick, H. & Forster, E. S. (1960). Aristotle: Posterior Analytics. Topica. Facing Greek and English pages. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Wansing, H. (Summer 2022). “Connexive Logic,” The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta (ed.).
<https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2022/entries/logic-connexive/>
Wedin, M. V. (1993) “Nonsubstantial Individuals,” Phronesis, 38 (2): 137–165. <https://doi.org/10.1163/156852893321052361>
Williamson, C. (1971). “Traditional logic as a logic of distribution-values,” Logique et Analyse 14 (56): 729–746.
Williamson, C. (1972). “Squares of opposition: Comparisons between syllogistic and propositional logic,” Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic, 13 (4): 497–500. <https://doi.org/10.1305/ndjfl/1093890711>
Williamson, C. (1988). “How many syllogisms are there?”, History and Philosophy of Logic, 9 (1): 77–85. <https://doi.org/10.1080/01445348808837127>
Derechos de autor 2023 Disputatio. Philosophical Research Bulletin
Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObrasDerivadas 4.0.
