Sobre los enunciados analíticos a posteriori: ¿son posibles?
Palabras clave:
Analiticidad, Analítico, a posteriori, Husserl
Resumen
Tradicionalmente, las nociones de analiticidad, aprioricidad y necesidad se han considerado coextensivas, y también sus contrapartes, a saber, sintetización, aposterioricidad y contingencia. Tal coextensividad ha sido cuestionada por filósofos como Kant y Husserl quienes, sobre la base de definiciones muy diferentes de analiticidad, postularon la existencia de enunciados sintéticos a priori y, por otro lado, por Kripke, quien defendió la existencia de lo contingente a priori y enunciados necesarios a posteriori. En este artículo, sobre la base de una nueva definición de analiticidad que puede verse como un refinamiento de la de Husserl, se argumenta a favor de la existencia de ejemplificaciones analíticas a posteriori de leyes analíticas.
Referencias
Carnap, Rudolf (1947). Meaning and Necessity. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, enlarged edition 1956.
Chateaubriand, Oswaldo (2005). Logical Forms. Part II: Logic, Language, and Knowledge. Campinas: Editora CLE/UNICAMP.
Chateaubriand, Oswaldo (2001). Logical Forms. Part I: Truth and Description. Campinas: Editora CLE/UNICAMP.
Frege, Gottlob (1884). Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik. Eine logisch-mathematische Untersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl. Centenarausgabe. Hamburg: F. Meiner, 1986.
Greenberg, Marvin (1980). Euclidean and Non–Euclidean Geometries: Development and History. Second edition. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Husserl, Edmund (1900–1901). Logische Untersuchungen. Hua XVIII & XIX (1/2). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff, 1975 & 1984.
Kant, Immanuel (1781). Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Revised edition 1787. Reprint of both editions. Hamburg: Felix Meiner 1990.
Kelley, John L. (1955). General Topology. New York: D. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
Kripke, Saul (1972). «Naming and Necessity». In Semantics of Natural Language, edited by D. Davidson and G. H. Harman. Dordrecht: Reidel. Enlarged edition, Blackwell: Oxford, 1980.
Kripke, Saul (1977). «Identity and Necessity». In Naming, Necessity and Natural Kinds, edited by Stephen P. Schwartz. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 66–101
Quine, Willard van Orman (1951). «Two Dogmas of Empiricism». Reprinted in From a Logical Point of View, pp. 20–46.
Riemann, Bernhard (1867). «Über die Hypothesen, welche der Geometrie zu Grunde liegen». Third edition, 1923. Reprint, New York: Chelsea 1973.
Rosado Haddock, Guillermo E. (1981). «Necessità a posteriori e Contingenze a priori in Kripke: alcune Note Critiche». Nominazione 2. Revised English version in: Against the Current. Selected Philosophical Papers. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, 2012, pp. 285–301
Rosado Haddock, Guillermo E. (2007) «Issues in the Philosophy of Logic: a Heterodox Approach». Principia 11, no. 1. Reprinted in: Against the Current. Selected Philosophical Papers. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, 2012, pp. 305–325
Rosado Haddock, Guillermo E. (2008). «Husserl on Analyticity and Beyond». Husserl Studies 24. Reprinted in: Against the Current. Selected Philosophical Papers. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, 2012, pp. 327–339
Rosado Haddock, Guillermo E. (2010). «Some Uses of Logic in Rigorous Philosophy». Axiomathes 20, no. 2–3. Reprinted in Against the Current. Selected Philosophical Papers. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag 2012, pp. 365–383
Rosado Haddock, Guillermo E. (2012). Against the Current. Selected Philosophical Papers. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag
Thron, Wolfgang J. (1966). Topological Structures. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Wolenski, Jan (2004). «Analytic vs. Synthetic and A Priori vs. A Posteriori». In Handbook of Epistemology, edited by I. Niniluoto, M. Sintonen and J. Wolenski. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 781–839.
Chateaubriand, Oswaldo (2005). Logical Forms. Part II: Logic, Language, and Knowledge. Campinas: Editora CLE/UNICAMP.
Chateaubriand, Oswaldo (2001). Logical Forms. Part I: Truth and Description. Campinas: Editora CLE/UNICAMP.
Frege, Gottlob (1884). Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik. Eine logisch-mathematische Untersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl. Centenarausgabe. Hamburg: F. Meiner, 1986.
Greenberg, Marvin (1980). Euclidean and Non–Euclidean Geometries: Development and History. Second edition. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman.
Husserl, Edmund (1900–1901). Logische Untersuchungen. Hua XVIII & XIX (1/2). Den Haag: Martinus Nijhoff, 1975 & 1984.
Kant, Immanuel (1781). Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Revised edition 1787. Reprint of both editions. Hamburg: Felix Meiner 1990.
Kelley, John L. (1955). General Topology. New York: D. Van Nostrand Reinhold Company.
Kripke, Saul (1972). «Naming and Necessity». In Semantics of Natural Language, edited by D. Davidson and G. H. Harman. Dordrecht: Reidel. Enlarged edition, Blackwell: Oxford, 1980.
Kripke, Saul (1977). «Identity and Necessity». In Naming, Necessity and Natural Kinds, edited by Stephen P. Schwartz. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, pp. 66–101
Quine, Willard van Orman (1951). «Two Dogmas of Empiricism». Reprinted in From a Logical Point of View, pp. 20–46.
Riemann, Bernhard (1867). «Über die Hypothesen, welche der Geometrie zu Grunde liegen». Third edition, 1923. Reprint, New York: Chelsea 1973.
Rosado Haddock, Guillermo E. (1981). «Necessità a posteriori e Contingenze a priori in Kripke: alcune Note Critiche». Nominazione 2. Revised English version in: Against the Current. Selected Philosophical Papers. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, 2012, pp. 285–301
Rosado Haddock, Guillermo E. (2007) «Issues in the Philosophy of Logic: a Heterodox Approach». Principia 11, no. 1. Reprinted in: Against the Current. Selected Philosophical Papers. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, 2012, pp. 305–325
Rosado Haddock, Guillermo E. (2008). «Husserl on Analyticity and Beyond». Husserl Studies 24. Reprinted in: Against the Current. Selected Philosophical Papers. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag, 2012, pp. 327–339
Rosado Haddock, Guillermo E. (2010). «Some Uses of Logic in Rigorous Philosophy». Axiomathes 20, no. 2–3. Reprinted in Against the Current. Selected Philosophical Papers. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag 2012, pp. 365–383
Rosado Haddock, Guillermo E. (2012). Against the Current. Selected Philosophical Papers. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag
Thron, Wolfgang J. (1966). Topological Structures. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Wolenski, Jan (2004). «Analytic vs. Synthetic and A Priori vs. A Posteriori». In Handbook of Epistemology, edited by I. Niniluoto, M. Sintonen and J. Wolenski. Dordrecht: Kluwer, pp. 781–839.
Publicado
2020-09-30
Cómo citar
[1]
Rosado Haddock, G.E. 2020. Sobre los enunciados analíticos a posteriori: ¿son posibles?. Disputatio. 9, 14 (sep. 2020), 1-13. DOI:https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4603158.
Número
Sección
Artículos y Ensayos
Derechos de autor 2020 © Disputatio
Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObrasDerivadas 4.0.
