Leyendo el Tractatus, Entendiendo a Wittgenstein
Resumen
Wittgenstein escribe en la sección 6.54 del Tractatus: «Mis proposiciones esclarecen porque quien me entiende las reconoce al final como absurdas». El lector es confrontado con esto a una tarea: aprender a leer el Tractatus de tal manera que entienda a su autor. Se trata aquí de dos maneras de lectura; la lectura de «inefabilidad» y la lectura «resoluta», ninguna de las dos siendo libre de problemas. El objetivo es diagnosticar confusiones claves en el fondo de estas lecturas y empezar a señalar una alternativa viable.
Referencias
Anscombe, G. E. M. (1959). An Introduction to Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. London: Hutchinson University Library.
Black, Max (1964). A Commentary on Wittgenstein’s Tractatus. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Crary, Alice (ed.) (2007). Wittgenstein and the Moral Life: Essays in Honor of Cora Diamond. Cambridge, Mass. and London: The MIT Press.
Crary, Alice and Rupert Read (eds.) (2000). The New Wittgenstein. London and New York: Routledge.
Conant, James (2002). “The Method of the Tractatus”. In: From Frege to Wittgenstein: Perspectives on Early Analytic Philosophy. Edited by Erich Reck. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 374–462. DOI: 10.1093/0195133269.003.0015.
Conant, James (2007). “Mild Mono–Wittgensteinianism”. In: Crary 2007, pp. 31–142.
Diamond, Cora (1988). “Throwing Away the Ladder: How to Read the Tractatus”. In: The Realistic Spirit: Wittgenstein, Philosophy, and the Mind. Cambridge, Mass.: The MIT Press, 1991, pp. 179–204.
Diamond, Cora (1991). “Ethics, Imagination and the Method of the Tractatus”. Reprinted in Crary and Read 2000, pp. 149 – 173.
Diamond, Cora (1996). “Wittgenstein, Mathematics, and Ethics: Resisting the Attractions of Realism”. In: The Cambridge Companion to Wittgenstein. Edited by Hans Sluga and David G. Stern. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 226–260. DOI: 10.1017/CCOL0521460255.
Diamond, Cora (2013). “Reading the Tractatus with G. E. M. Anscombe”. In: The Oxford Handbook of the History of Analytic Philosophy. Edited by Michael Beaney. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 870–905. DOI: 10.1017/S0031819114000321.
Diamond, Cora (2019). Reading Wittgenstein with Anscombe, Going On to Ethics. Cambridge, Mass. and London: Harvard University Press.
Engelman, Paul (1968). Letters from Ludwig Wittgenstein. With a Memoir. New York: Horizon Press.
Floyd, Juliet (1998). “The Uncaptive Eye: Solipsism in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus”. In: Loneliness. Edited by Leroy S. Rouner. Notre Dame, Indiana: University of Notre Dame Press, pp. 79–108.
Floyd, Juliet (2000). “Wittgenstein, Mathematics, and Philosophy”. In: Crary and Read 2000, pp. 232–261.
Floyd, Juliet (2007). “Wittgenstein and the Inexpressible”. In: Crary 2007, pp. 177–234.
Goldfarb, Warren (2011). “Das Überwinden: Anti-Metaphysical Readings of the Tractatus”. In: Read and Lavery (2011), pp. 6–21.
Hutchinson, Phil and Rupert Read (2006). “An Elucidatory Interpretation of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus: A Critique of Daniel D. Hutto’s and Marie McGinn’s Reading of Tractatus 6.54”. International Journal of Philosophical Studies vol. 14, no. 1: pp. 1–29. DOI: 10.1080/09672550500321585.
Hutto, Daniel D. (2003). Wittgenstein and the End of Philosophy: Neither Theory Nor Therapy. Basingstoke: Palgrave. DOI: 10.1057/9780230503205.
Krebs, Victor J. (2001). “‘Around the axis of our real need’: On the Ethical Point of Wittgenstein’s Philosophy”. European Journal of Philosophy vol. 9, no. 3: pp. 344–374. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0378.00141.
Lavery, Matthew A. (2011). “Toward a Useful Jacobinism: A response to Bronzo”. In: Read and Lavery (2011), pp. 112–120.
Macbeth, Danielle (2005). Frege’s Logic. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
Macbeth, Danielle (2014). Realizing Reason: A Narrative of Truth and Knowing. Oxford: Oxford University Press. DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198704751.001.0001.
Macbeth, Danielle (2019). “Wittgenstein and Brandom on Normativity and Sociality”. Disputatio vol. 8 no. 9: pp. 193 - 221. DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.4595880.
Macbeth, Danielle (2020). “Reading Rorty: A Sketch of a Plan”. In: A Companion to Rorty. Edited by Alan Malachowski. Hoboken: John Wiley and Sons, pp. 11–24.
McGinn, Marie (1999). “Between Metaphysics and Nonsense: Elucidation in Wittgenstein’s Tractatus”. Philosophical Quarterly 49: pp. 491–513. DOI: 10.1111/1467-9213.00155.
Midgley, Mary (1992) “Philosophical Plumbing”. Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplements vol. 33: pp. 139 – 151. DOI: 10.1017/S1358246100002319.
Monk, Ray (2001). “Philosophical Biography: The Very Idea”. In: Wittgenstein: Biography and Philosophy. Edited by James C. Klagge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 3–15.
Read, Rupert and Lavery, Matthew A. (eds.) (2011). Beyond the Tractatus Wars: The New Wittgenstein Debate. Hoboken: Taylor and Francis.
Sellars, Wilfrid (1956). “Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind”. In: Science, Perception and Reality. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul; New York: The Humanities Press, pp. 127–196. DOI: 10.2307/2024199.
Sullivan, Peter (2002). “On Trying to be Resolute: A Response to Kremer on the Tractatus”. European Journal of Philosophy vol. 10 no. 1: pp. 43–78. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0378.00149.
White, Roger M (2011). “Throwing the Baby out with the Ladder: On ‘Therapeutic’ Readings of Wittgenstein’s Tractatus”. In: Read and Lavery (2011), pp. 22–65.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1921/1961). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. Translated by D. F. Pears and B. F. McGuinness. London and New York: Routledge.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1953/1976). Philosophical Investigations. Second Edition. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1979). Notebooks 1914 – 1916. Second edition. Translated by G. E. M. Anscombe and edited by G. H. von Wright and G. E. M. Anscombe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Wittgenstein, Ludwig (1980). Culture and Value. Translated by Peter Winch and edited by G. H. von Wright with Heikki Nyman. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Derechos de autor 2022 Disputatio. Philosophical Research Bulletin
Esta obra está bajo licencia internacional Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-SinObrasDerivadas 4.0.